CHRISLEY FAMILY TAKES LEGAL ACTION: $25M lawsuit claims errors led to conviction and years in custody.
Todd and Julie Chrisley, the reality TV couple known for Chrisley Knows Best, have launched a $25 million lawsuit against an Atlanta-based law firm and one of its attorneys, alleging that serious legal mistakes played a central role in their federal convictions and subsequent prison sentences.
The lawsuit, filed on June 5 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, targets Balch & Bingham LLP and attorney Chris Anulewicz. The couple claims that the legal team failed in their duty of representation, making critical errors that ultimately contributed to their downfall in one of the most high-profile fraud cases involving reality television personalities in recent years.
ALLEGATIONS OF POOR REPRESENTATION
According to the complaint, the Chrisleys argue that the law firm placed “its own interests ahead of their clients’ lives,” allegedly accepting the case for publicity and business exposure rather than focusing on proper criminal defense strategy.
The filing further claims that Chris Anulewicz, who was assigned as lead counsel, lacked meaningful experience in criminal defense cases of this scale and complexity. The couple alleges that this lack of expertise directly impacted the handling of key legal decisions during their trial process.
In addition, the lawsuit includes accusations that Anulewicz encouraged the couple to invest $75,000 in a food truck business connected to his family, a claim that adds another layer of controversy to the already complex legal dispute.
CLAIMS ABOUT MISSED LEGAL OPPORTUNITIES
A central argument in the lawsuit revolves around what the Chrisleys describe as a critical missed legal opportunity that allegedly changed the course of their case.
The filing claims that evidence used against them stemmed from what they describe as an “unlawful, warrantless search” conducted by the Georgia Department of Revenue. According to the lawsuit, although a court later agreed that the initial search was illegal and suppressed certain physical documents, their legal team failed to take the additional step of suppressing derivative evidence — including emails, financial records, and other documents obtained indirectly from the original search.
The Chrisleys argue that this oversight allowed key evidence to remain admissible, forming the foundation of the prosecution’s case and ultimately contributing to their convictions on multiple counts.
“The illegal search launched the entire federal case,” the lawsuit states, adding that proper legal motions could have changed the outcome entirely.
FINANCIAL AND PERSONAL DAMAGES CLAIMED
The couple is seeking $25 million in damages, arguing that the consequences of their legal representation extended far beyond the courtroom.
They claim that their convictions led to the collapse of their television career, loss of endorsement deals, and significant reputational damage. The lawsuit also highlights the emotional toll of their imprisonment, including separation from each other and their children.
According to the filing, the total financial impact exceeds $25 million in lost income alone, in addition to millions spent on appeals and post-conviction legal efforts aimed at challenging their convictions.
BACKGROUND OF THE FEDERAL CASE
Todd and Julie Chrisley were originally convicted in 2022 in an Atlanta federal court on multiple charges, including conspiracy to commit bank fraud, bank fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and tax fraud. Julie Chrisley also faced additional charges related to wire fraud and obstruction of justice.
Following their convictions, Todd Chrisley was sentenced to 12 years in federal prison along with 16 months of probation, while Julie Chrisley received a seven-year sentence and the same probation period.
The case attracted widespread media attention due to the couple’s public profile as reality television stars and the dramatic contrast between their on-screen persona and the serious financial crimes alleged by prosecutors.
POLITICAL INTERVENTION AND PARDON
In 2024, their daughter Savannah Chrisley publicly campaigned for her parents’ release, including an appeal to President Donald Trump. During a speech at the Republican National Convention, she criticized what she described as “rogue prosecutors” and called attention to what she believed were injustices in the case.
Her efforts culminated last year when President Trump granted Todd and Julie Chrisley a full pardon, effectively ending their prison sentences.
The pardon added another layer of complexity to the legal and public debate surrounding the case, with supporters viewing it as vindication and critics questioning the broader implications of the decision.
LEGAL TEAM RESPONSE
Jay V. Surgent, attorney for the Chrisleys, issued a statement supporting the lawsuit, emphasizing that the couple had already been pardoned and arguing that their constitutional rights were violated during the investigation and prosecution process.
He also criticized law enforcement procedures, particularly the handling of evidence collection, describing parts of the investigation as improper and unconstitutional.
A HIGH-STAKES LEGAL BATTLE CONTINUES
The $25 million lawsuit now represents a new chapter in the long-running legal saga involving the Chrisley family. While their criminal case has already concluded with convictions, prison time, and a presidential pardon, this civil action shifts the focus toward alleged malpractice and accountability within their former legal defense team.
As the case moves forward, it is expected to draw continued public attention due to the high-profile nature of the individuals involved and the serious allegations being raised against their former attorneys.
For now, Todd and Julie Chrisley’s legal battle is far from over — and the outcome of this new lawsuit could reshape how their entire case is viewed in the public eye.








